INNOBLOG

Lillian Zhao

When I first was told that Mocospace was getting VC backing in early 2007, I skeptically thought: “Who’s going to use another social networking site?!”

Eighteen months later Mocospace has grown to become the leading mobile social networking site in North America. With more than one billion mobile page views per month, it’s holding its own against incumbents like Facebook (which has more than 300,000 mobile page views per month).How did Mocospace become so popular?

What I didn’t realize when I first heard about Mocospace was that it has a powerful, disruptive business model that has successfully targeted a new distribution channel (the mobile phone) and a new customer base (non-consumers of existing social networking sites). This disruptive business model has propelled it to a leadership position in mobile social networking.

New Channel

Mocospace was one of the first to create a social networking site specifically designed the mobile phone. There is a subtle though distinct difference in how people use social networks on the PC vs. the mobile phone that stems from the basic differences between the PC and the mobile phone –- the PC is a static, multi-function device, whereas the mobile phone is an always-on, always-connected, communication device.

Mocospace realized this early on, and optimized its features for the jobs-to-be-done of a mobile phone user: instant communication, quick entertainment, killing time, and staying socially connected. Mocospace offers every type of communication (chat, IM, mail, messaging, micro-blogging and even voice-messaging) in one place. Other entertainment options include games, rating other people’s photos, watching videos, contributing to forums (my personal favorite are the ‘yo mama jokes’ in the jokes forum). Mocospace’s “friend finder” application also serves members’ job-to-be-done of meeting new friends and staying connected with existing friends.

Mocospace’s strategy is different from the incumbents, Facebook and MySpace, which emphasize content rich user pages and graphic-intensive applications –- all awesome features that work great on a PC’s screen, but are too cumbersome to navigate on the phone. As such, they’ve naturally chosen to use the mobile to extend a subset of their online features. However, MySpace’s initial strategy was to charge users an annual monthly subscription, shared with the carriers, to use their mobile site. That strategy was not overly successful and has now been de-emphasized.

In contrast, Mocospace’s site is extremely mobile-phone user-friendly, as all functions have been optimized for the small screen and numeric keypad input. For example, it leverages icon-based navigation and limits the amount of words and excess visual distractions per page. The results are clean, easy-to-navigate pages.

Meeting the needs of nonconsumers

Mocospace’s functionality serves the jobs-to-be-done of a previously untapped market: nonconsumers of existing social networking sites designed to be accessed on the PC. A large portion of the US population doesn’t have constant, private access to a PC with a broadband connection, for a variety of reasons that could include on-the-go lifestyles, economic limitations, and/or remote locations. However, most of these users have a mobile phone. Some use unlimited data plans from carriers like Leap Wireless and MetroPCS, in lieu of a PC. This eclectic group of urban youth and mobile workers were the early adopters of Mocospace. They didn’t have PC access 24/7; but they had mobile access 24/7.

While Mocospace has clearly done extremely well to date as a mobile social networking site, I still wonder if it can sustain its leadership position. Despite impressive monthly growth, will it be able to continuously grow its user base to solidify its dominance in the mobile social networking sector? Or will incumbents Facebook and MySpace, or even a new start-up, take the mobile lead away from Mocospace? If so, how will Mocospace’s strategy’s change?

Time will tell. And, I am scheduling an interview with the founders of Mocospace soon, and I'll be sure to ask about these issues.

Watch for the “Voices of Disruption” interview with Mocospace co-founder, Justin Siegel, in the July/August edition of Strategy & Innovation. 

The Fortune 500 issue had a fascinating story about Amazon.com. “It’s easy to believe that Jeff Bezos is one of the great innovators,” the story noted. “But that’s not exactly the case. His rise into Fortune 500-dom actually has little to do with innovation and more to do with iteration.”

It pains me when I see innovation and iteration painted as opposed in some way. In fact, the only way to successfully innovate is to be prepared to iterate like crazy.

There is a misbegotten belief that new growth businesses arise fully formed out of an innovator’s head. That couldn’t be further from the truth. Carefully look at the history of just about any innovation success and you’ll find a course correction, if not an outright failure.

There are many classic examples of innovation through iteration. Google was just another search engine until it iterated its way to AdWords and AdSense. About three months before the public launch of the iPhone, Apple CEO Steve Jobs sent the design team back to the drawing board because of flaws in the product’s design. James Dyson created more than 5,000 failed prototypes of his wildly successful vacuum cleaner. And so on. ...

Read the rest at Scott's Harvard Management blog, Innovation Insights

It’s rare that we see an advertising campaign embrace a jobs-to-be-done approach as clearly as the one recently executed by Yellowbook and its partner, ad agency Gotham.

Printed Yellow Pages directories, such as those published by Yellowbook, were once the dominant source of local business contact information. The Internet, a constantly updated, interactive source of information, is now forcing Yellow Pages publishers to rethink their positioning and indeed, their relevance. Many consumers, it seems, continue to think of its iconic yellow-paper directory, for example, when they think of Yellowbook.

Desiring to change the way consumers think of its product, Yellowbook launched a new ad campaign last week. The first two television ads, which can be viewed here, show two individuals using a Yellowbook online site to seek basic solutions to superficial problems. The ads then reveal the true concern (job) that each individual is really seeking to address.

In the first ad, a kid searching for martial arts is really seeking self-confidence. In the second ad, a bride searching for help removing an old tattoo is really seeking a fresh start.

It seems possible that this window into the true inner concerns of the participants may elicit an emotional response from viewers who may, in turn, use yellowbook.com to find solutions to their own inner concerns. Despite this use of jobs in its advertising campaign, however, the yellowbook.com directory remains organized as a printed Yellow Pages directory, searchable by basic vertical category. Perhaps an opportunity exists for the site to implement a jobs-based search feature in the future — I wonder what price businesses would pay to be the first result returned by a search for "self-confidence"? 

If you work in a large company and you want to become humble quickly, check out Stall Points, a fascinating stream of research by the Corporate Executive Board that was recently a cover story for the Harvard Business Review. The research shows that almost all companies hit a point where historical growth rates decelerate. Once the corporate growth engine stalls, it is very hard to restart.

The study involved close to 500 companies that have appeared on the Fortune 100 or international equivalents over the past 50 years. Close to 90 percent of those companies experienced a stall, or “secular reversals in company growth fortunes.” Only 50 percent of companies that stalled were able to grow even moderately over the next decade.

There are many reasons why growth becomes increasingly difficult as a company grows. One challenge is that the hurdle for new initiatives becomes so high that many potential game-changing initiatives never see the light of day.

A few weeks ago I was with a group of senior executives at a Fortune 100 company. We were talking about the strategic objectives of that company’s innovation efforts. One executive said that $1 billion felt like a reasonable target for a generic new growth initiative. Another said, “A billion is nice, but at our size we really need to set the target at $10 billion.”

Mathematically, of course, the executive is right. It got me thinking, though. Only 261 public U.S. companies had $10 billion in revenues last year. How many of the high-flying start-up companies over the last decade reached $10 billion in revenue in 10 years? Well, Google hit $10 billion in its eighth year (2006) and … I think that’s it.  …

Read the rest at Scott's Harvard Management blog, Innovation Insights

As summer approaches, soon you will no longer have to venture off to the ice cream store for a treat. Taunton, MA-based MooBella offers a vending machine that creates a fresh scoop of ice cream for under $3 in under one minute.  Moo-bella is essentially “competing against non-consumption” as they expand the opportunities for consumers to enjoy fresh ice cream, and enable restaurateurs and cafeteria operators to expand their sales with a new offering without sacrificing the floor space or labor that is traditionally needed.

As MooBella has delayed its roll-out, I suspect the company is struggling with its launch plans for this new product. We would urge them to initially launch an offering that is “good-enough” by focusing their launch on bringing a tasty offering with limited flavor selection to market in a controlled environment. Their current plan to launch within existing food-service locations fits such a strategy; the operators can perform minor maintenance and collect payments while providing MooBella with feedback on how to adjust their future vending machines and product offerings. Armed with the knowledge from these market tests, MooBella can then look to improve its product on other dimensions by launching new flavors or developing a truly self-service machine that requires no maintenance and can accept payments.

There's also an important lesson here for traditional ice-cream retailers who may not initially view MooBella as a competitor. To find new opportunities for market growth, you need to continually go beyond new product introductions and look at the circumstances in which consumers can consume your product. While ice cream shops offer a unique family experience, MooBella can become a more potent disruptive force by partnering with restaurateurs and foodservice operators to offer different experiences in various circumstances.