Online microblogging and social networking service Twitter started in March 2006 but didn’t really hit its stride until the past few months ago. September 2008’s 5.57 million visitors represented a fivefold increase within a month’s time. This usage curve has dovetailed with my own Twitter experience. I signed up for Twitter as @ReneeCallahan in the spring of 2007, when a number of my blogging friends were signing up. I couldn’t figure out what to do with it until this past October, when I joined a group of people “tweeting” snippets from the Business Innovation Factory’s BIF-4 conference.
Since then I’ve stepped into the Twitter conversation stream several times each day and have come to value the camaraderie and knowledge-sharing I find there. It's truly amazing how much information can be put into a 140-character post.
I’ve begun to wonder whether Twitter has in it the seeds of disruption. First thing I'd need to know is, if Twitter is in fact disruptive, what is it disrupting? Social media consultant Laura Fitton of Pistachio Consulting (@Pistachio) helped me gather information on this by putting up a quick survey using Google Docs and publicizing it to her 12,500 twitter followers. Here's what 128 respondents felt Twitter disrupted when they were allowed to choose all applicable answers:
When the respondents were forced to choose only one answer from the list, the results looked like this:
Open-end answers to the question included: Craigslist, real conversation, sleep, PR, media gatekeepers, eating, and writing my dissertation. There was also a fair amount of comment in the open-end answers as to whether Twitter is truly disruptive.
In order for Twitter to disrupt, it would need to display the characteristics of disruptive innovation: it would need to be a good-enough, low-cost solution to a job that anough people were trying to get done that it would create a new market at the low end of an established market.
What do you think? Is Twitter potentially disruptive? If so, what might it be disrupting?
